Don’t end up in expensive litigation over something that could have been cured by spending a few dollars.

Date: January 2015

A difficult issue is created for employers when they need to communicate with employees on leave. What is the best mechanism to communicate in a not-overly-threatening manner, but also to document the communication and confirm the employee’s receipt?

Traditionally, U.S. Mail was thought sufficient because of the “Mailbox Rule,” which is an assumption that an item mailed was received by the recipient. Now however, several cases have held that U.S. Mail or email alone, or even in conjunction, is not sufficient, especially under the Family Medical Leave Act (FMLA). The employer must prove that the employee actually received the notice, and the employee’s denial of receipt may by itself be enough to create an issue of fact, so that the employer will be forced to let a jury decide the issue.

One suggestion is to have employees sign a form, before leave ever becomes an issue, by which they consent to electronic communications. Even then, when you send an FMLA notice electronically, use the “read receipt” feature on your email. If you do not receive the confirmation, communicate with the employee in another manner. If you prefer to communicate in hard copy, send your communications by certified, registered or overnight mail, which requires the employee to sign for receipt. That way, you won’t end up in expensive litigation over something that could have been cured by the expenditure of a few dollars.

This article is intended to provide general information prepared by professionals in regard to the subject matter covered. It is provided with the understanding that, in providing this information, the author is not engaged in rendering a legal or other professional service. Although prepared by professionals, these materials should not be utilized as a substitute for professional service in specific situations. If legal advice or other expert assistance is required, the service of a professional should be sought.​

Accommodating Pregnant Employees NLRB Takes Aim at Employee Handbooks FMLA: Communicating with Employees on Leave Minimum Wage: Don’t Overlook Arizona’s Higher Requirement Employers, Large or Small: Obamacare Requires Action by October 1 Reducing the Risk of Wrongful Termination Supreme Court Decides Cases in Favor of Employers​ Obamacare Update: Employer Mandate Pushed Back to 2015 Employee Voting Rights: Arizona Employer Obligations IRS Program Offers Employers a Break for Misclassifying Workers Social Networking and the Workplace The Fair Labor Standards Act Court Suspends NLRB-Required Notice of Collective Bargaining Rights Avoiding The Threat of Genetic Discrimination U.S. Supreme Court Upholds Arizona’s Employer Sanctions Law The Affordable Care Act: Things to Know for 2011 Confidentiality in Investigations: A Trap for Unwary Employers? Restrictive Covenants in Employment Agreement Found to Be Too Broad OSHA Clash with State Safety Regulators a Concern to Employers Unique Legal Issues Affect Employers on Arizona Indian Reservations​ Prepare Now for the Obamacare Employer Mandate

Contact Barton Law Today!

An attorney with litigation experience, a comprehensive understanding of business and employment law, and the right training can make all the difference when it comes to protecting the rights of both the employer and the employee. If you have questions or problems in this area, call Barton Law at 602.753.9147.

Contact Barton Law
Barton Law